Glen Johnson Picks A Fight With Mitt
January 17th, 2008 by JonI’m not a reporter, nor do I pretend to be one. I read most of what is written about Mitt and comment when I feel like it. My political bias is very evident – I make no claim to objectivity. With me, what you read is what you get.
Most MSM reporters at least attempt to make a window dressing claim to objectivity. A lack of bias – whether perceived or real – is critical to their claim to be the honest broker about what they cover.
Very few reporters are very good at this. NBC’s David Gregory, for instance, has made somewhat of a career playing journalistic judo with White House Press Secretaries. He did fairly well at it until Tony Snow came to town. Tony Snow ate David Gregory’s lunch on a daily basis. That was high quality entertainment.
The AP’s Glen Johnson covers the Mitt campaign. He makes somewhat of an attempt to feign objectivity. Sometimes he’s successful. Most times he is not. Today he failed in spectacular fashion and picked a fight with Mitt over just who runs the Mitt campaign. Maybe this has happened before but this is the first time I’ve seen it reported. Maybe Glen Johnson didn’t buy ABC’s Matt Stuart a beer one night. Who knows?
A reporter’s job is to report the facts, not make the news. Mitt said the following during the “media availability†where the brouhaha occurred:
[Washington needs a leader who]… will fight to make sure we resolve the issues rather than continuously look for partisan opportunities for score settling and for opportunities to link closer to lobbyists. I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign. (Emphasis Added)
To which Glen Johnson retorted:
That’s not true governor. That is not true. Ron Kaufman’s a lobbyist. How can you say that you don’t have lobbyists? (Emphasis Added)
You’ll note the obvious trap set by Johnson. Mitt never claimed he didn’t have lobbyists. Mitt stated that lobbyists don’t run his campaign. Mitt immediately threw a smackdown on Johnson:
Did you hear what I said? Did you hear what I said Glen?
Of course Johnson heard what Mitt said. Johnson’s automatic “gotcha†filter just took out what Johnson didn’t want to hear. Johnson replied:
That you don’t have lobbyists running your campaign.
Wow. Maybe Johnson can hear after all. Mitt then explained that Beth Myers, his campaign manager was the one running his campaign. Johnson, obviously unfamiliar with the job description of a campaign manager, continued his disrespectful accusation that Mitt was lying about who is actually running his campaign.
Fox News’ Shushannah Walshe has the rest of Mitt’s Glen Johnson Smackdown. Johnson continued his diatribe on Ron Kaufman’s role in Mitt’s campaign. Said Johnson:
So Ron’s just … window dressing. He’s just a potted plant?
Sigh. Mitt answered:
Ron is a wonderful friend — an adviser. He’s not paid. Hes an adviser like many others. But I do not have lobbyists running my campaign. Glen, I appreciate that you think that’s funny, but Ron Kaufman is not even in on the senior strategy meetings of our campaign.
Johnson then uttered something inaudible. Mitt answered the inaudible question thusly:
Excuse me, Glen. He is not in on the senior strategy meetings of our campaign.
Johnson, still tilting at windmills, tried a different tack:
Is he in the debate sessions at all? Any time-Â
And finally Mitt had enough and unloaded on Johnson:
At any time? Has he ever been at a debate session? Sure. Is that a senior strategy meeting? Is that a senior strategy meeting of our campaign? No. Let me go back and complete the point I was making. My campaign is not based on Washington lobbyists. I haven’t been in Washington. I don’t have lobbyists at my elbows that are arguing for one industry or another industry. And I do not have favors I have to repay to people who have been in Washington for years nor scores I have to settle. And I’m going to Washington to make things happen. And somebody doesn’t put the kind of financial resources that I’ve put into this campaign and the personal resources I’ve put into this campaign in order to do favors for lobbyists. I’m going to Washington to help the American people, and that’s what this campaign is all about. (Emphasis Added)
UPDATE: ABC has released a video of the exhange.  Evidently, in this office supply store, Glen Johnson couldn’t find a chair so he took shots at Mitt from literally from the floor. CBS also has video which runs longer and has more footage of Johnson’s meltdown as he’s being lectured on professionalism from a Mitt handler. Check out the last 15 seconds where a wonderful elderly lady lays a smackdown on Johnson and declares him to be “mean and ugly”. Ouch! That’s gonna leave a mark!
Maybe life on the campaign trail is getting to Glen Johnson. Maybe he’s been relegated to a middle seat in the back of the campaign trail. Whatever the reason may be, his behavior in this situation is disgraceful. You don’t see this coming from Liz Sidoti, Michael Luo, or any of the other MSM reporters assigned to cover Mitt. While each of them may have their own personal bias and issues, at least they keep them to themselves. Last time I checked, the job of a reporter is to report, not to challenge a candidate to a verbal duel. Regardless of that fact, Johnson lost this duel.
Memo to Glen Johnson: Words mean things. Mitt means what he says when he tells you who runs his campaign. It’s his campaign organization – you don’t have better insight into it than he does. It’s called a vacation. Consider one. End Memo.
Oh, and on a completely unrelated tangent, Howlin’ Mad Howie Dean’s Head Mitt Hit Man Damien LaVera is back. I was beginning to get worried about that guy. I’m sad to say his absence hasn’t improved his press releases.  At least the DNC changed the moniker they were using to Millionaire Mitt. Memo to Damien: At least Mitt made his money the old fashioned way. The same cannot be said of Her (Less Than) Inevitableness.
Sphere: Related ContentPosted in 2008 presidential campaign |

January 17th, 2008 at 4:50 pm
[…] I won’t write much of this but will refer to a good write-up done by Jon at Blogs for Mitt. […]
January 18th, 2008 at 11:37 am
Thank you! Thank you! I appreciate being able to read the rest of the exchange between Mitt and this idiot, Glen Johnson. Of course Fox New’s Campaign Carl Cameron left out the final blast from Mitt setting the story straight. I’ve emailed every Fox address I can because the “Fair & Balanced” reporting style of Carl Cameron doesn’t apply to Mitt. Thank you, again!
January 18th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
WOOHOO!! Mitt won Michigan–now it’s off to Nevada and South Carolina!!
I’ve been a little bit out of the loop lately, it’s been especially busy down at the embryonic stem cell research factory lately. We’re trying to use stem cells to grow a conscience for Republicans who still believe that George Bush is doing a good job in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary; this is proving to be the most intractable problem we’ve ever faced. Every time we try, we come up with a perfect genetic copy of Rush Limbaugh’s ass. Curious indeed, but we’ll keep working on it.
Anyhoo…how about our boy Mitt? He finally won the gold medal all his adoring legions were praying for (when they weren’t busy praying for a plague of angry, rabid locusts to descend upon the McCain and Huckabee camps).
But it’s not just that Mitt won that is most exciting for his supporters, it’s HOW he won. Taking a page from Bush’s playbook, Mitt has chosen to bank on the stupidity of the Republican electorate. Quite simply, he lied—and the people loved it!! Republicans, it seems, have an incredible propensity to ignore what they know in their gut about a person, and choose instead to accept statements they know not to be true, but which are spoken in a confident, reassuring way. A couple of weeks ago Mitt was playing the part of a small government conservative, but in Michigan he morphed into a big government economic liberal, backing a $100 billion bailout for the auto industry…the people of Michigan forgot about the old Mitt, they loved the new one! He denounced the increase of the corporate CAFE standards last week in Michigan, completely at odds with his previous statements, but once again, Michiganders ignored Mitt’s past statements and focused on the new Mitt. Forget his past support in gay rights, the new Mitt says that he despises gays, and Republicans love it! Ignore my past support of abortion rights, says Mitt, focus instead on my new position against those same rights. Republicans dutifully comply! Pay no attention to his past record in Massachusetts where he increased taxes and fees by a total of $700 million, he says that he’s a committed tax cutter, and people simply accept it! He asks that we ignore his history of slashing jobs as a corporate raider at Bain Capital, focus instead on his re-invention as a supporter of job growth…and we do! He’s found the formula for success; simple prevarication. Given that this is at the core of the man, his stock in trade so to speak, he seems at this point to be a shoo-in for the nomination!
It’s has been pointed out repeatedly that Mitt has been on both sides of nearly every major issue. Rational people might see this as a liability, but many Republicans (principally of those who still support Bush, one presumes) don’t see it that way. Rather than focus on his hyper-aggressive flip flopping, they dutifully do what Mitt asks and focus on his latest incarnation. Mitt’s campaign seems predicated on the belief that most Republicans are either stupid enough or have poor powers of recollection (ideally both) to put him over the top. So far it seems to be working. Go Mitt!
January 19th, 2008 at 8:11 am
Readers will have to indluge phil. He drinks deeply from the DailyKos fire hose.
January 20th, 2008 at 12:30 am
What planet is Phil from? Is Phil just an angry old man or ???
January 20th, 2008 at 3:00 pm
Thank you for writing about Glen Johnson. I am hoping a lot of light shined on his actions will make reporters a little more respectful in future. I don’t hold out a lot of hope for that but we have to try.
January 21st, 2008 at 7:29 am
Mitt stayed on point, did not lose his cool and shot down every attempt at the liberal media hound to catch him in a lie,
something which they want to so desperatly, they can’t stand an honest faithful canidate. They love anyone who has dirt so that they can gossip and tear someone down. I only watch news when something worth watching is on, the rest is just sensationalism, britney spears blah blah blah.