January 3rd, 2008 by Jon
This is where the rubber meets the road and people start putting reality into the polls everyone’s been watching for well over a year.
Predictions are a dime a dozen, and For reports direct from Team Mitt, stop by Jason over at MyManMitt.com He’s on the ground with Mitt in Iowa writing as the events take place. Drop him a few bucks while you’re there – this trip is coming out of his own wallet.
A few final comments for now:
This is what campaigns do when they lack the resources , record, and ability to answer comparison ads. Here’s a very good reason to send Huck packing tonight. I for one don’t ever want to see Susan Estrich dancing to anything.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in 2008 presidential campaign, Campaign, General, mitt romney | No Comments »
May 16th, 2007 by Jon
Tricia Erickson wants to warn you about Mitt – at least that’s what she wants you to think. In all reality, however, she just wants a platform upon which she can establish herself as relevant. She’s tried several different avenues so far – so let’s chronicle her attempts to insert herself into the limelight.Â
Politico’s Mike Allen – along with many other media movers and shakers – received a long, rambling email from Ms. Erickson entitled “Can Mitt Romney Serve Two Masters? The Mormon Church vs. the United States of America†which – among other things – offered “guest appearances†featuring Ms. Ericson as an “expert†on Mormonism.Â
I caught wind of Erickson’s diatribes sometime ago and had to chuckle. Her experience with Mormons ended during her teen-age years and yet she still claims expertise on a subject and people she’s long separated herself from. Maybe she has delusions of working as a PBS documentary subject someday.Â
Erickson’s singular claim to fame – other than being an anti-Mormon bigot – is her having headed a modeling agency which represented the likes of Fawn Hall and Donna Rice. Maybe you’ve heard of those two – maybe you haven’t. Think really bad 1980’s hair – maybe that’ll help. Now she bills herself as a crisis-management expert. If your crisis happens to be caused by your secretary stuffing classified memos in her unmentionables or your presidential candidate having a Monkey Business fling, I’m sure Ms. Erickson can help you. Should your crisis happen to involve something else, good luck and let me know how she works out for you.Â
Now she’s in search of a talk show (radio/television/blog/outerspace) which will book her as a “Mormon†expert and by so doing will allow her to again enter the limelight – this time to vent all of her pent up anti-Mormon rage upon whichever listener/viewer happens to be in the vicinity. Â
Personally, if I were Ms. Erickson, I wouldn’t spend too much time sitting by the phone waiting to be booked for anything other than a late night infomercial featuring the No Excuses Jeans clothing line.
Â
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Campaign, General | 8 Comments »
May 11th, 2007 by Jon
We’ll start today with Time Magazine’s Karen Tumulty. She writes one of the articles in Mitt’s Time Cover. All in all, not bad, but not spectacular either. Nancy Gibbs writes another – focusing on the Mormon question – again. Yawn.  She makes a point of highlighting every page in the anti-Mormon playbook. Memo to Nancy: If you’re going to take shots, at least try to make them original. End memo.
Â
CBS 60 Minutes frontman Mike Wallace has finally gone around the bend. He had the audacity to ask Mitt and Ann if they engaged in pre-marital sex. No, I am not making this up. I’d suggest that Wallace first disclose the details of his own sex life before prying into the private lives of others, but the thought of Wallace so engaged makes my stomach do triple gainers. CBN’s David Brody says “Oi, Vey.â€Â Amen to that David.
Â
The AP’s Glen Johnson (published by ABCNews) summarizes Mitt’s 60 Minutes interview. Evidently the headline is used only to get readership because it has little to do with the article.
Â
Howlin’ Mad Howie Dean’s Head Mitt Hit Man Damien LaVera loves to see himself quoted – so much so that he himself does the quoting.
Â
The New York Times’ Michael Luo reports on Mitt’s visit to Ames, Iowa.
Â
Buzzle.com’s Ewen MacAskill gives a pretty good short intro to Mitt.
Â
World Magazine’s Joel Belz tries to do the same thing, but fails miserable by opening with a quote from a religious bigot who can’t even string two words together without slamming Mormons. Â
Â
The Phoenix’s David Bernstein combs through Mitt’s donor list and finds more housewives than working women. So, David, where did all that cash come from? Oh yeah, I forgot. The Mormon Mafia and Utah farmers. Tell me, Dave, just how many tin-foil hats do you have in your closet?
Â
The National Ledger’s Jackson Simpson highlights Mitt’s comments about the Bush Administration’s mistakes in regard to Iraq. This will no doubt become MSM fodder for the weekend news cycle. The MSM doesn’t understand the fact nobody can plan for every possibility in a war. Patton said that the best war plans seldom survive first contact with the enemy. Bush understands this. Mitt understands this. Warriors understand this. The MSM – so deeply afflicted by Bush Derangement Syndrome – understands little or nothing but what Moveon.org tells them.
Â
NRO’s Kathryn Jean Lopez wonders what the big deal is about Mormons. Turns out she is one. Stand by for references to the vast Mormon conspiracy.
Â
GoUpstate.com’s Jason Spencer unearths some thinly veiled anti-Mitt hate mail masquerading as anti-Mormon literature. Yes, dear reader, its gotten ugly and will get uglier. This is what cowards do. They are unable to compete against Mitt on the campaign trail so they send out hate mail. Some digging needs to be done in Providence.
Â
For those of you unfamiliar with Mitt’s fortune, he’s rich. Now that we’ve cleared up that important information…
Â
KMBC-TV had a conversation with Mitt.
Â
The AP’s Mike Glover reports on the Reverend Al’s progress in digging holes.
The New York Times’ Michael Luo says Al thinks anyone who was an LDS Church member prior to 1978 is a racist. Nice try, Al. How’s that steam shovel working for you?
Â
Blogfather Hugh interviewed Academy Award winning Actor Jon Voight. Voight is a good actor, and he spells his name right. I’m not sure I agree with his take on September Dawn, but I respect his candor – a rare thing in today’s Hollywood.
Â
William F. Buckley’s piece on Mitt’s abortion stance is well worth the read. Buckley reminds us there is such a thing as a “moral†thought process.
Â
The New Republic’s Michelle Cottle thinks Mitt should attempt to coddle liberals with bait like attempts to “cut greenhouse gases, woo immigrants, and get us the hell out of Iraq.â€Â Sure, Michelle. If we want entertainment like that, we’ll watch Katie Couric.Â
Â
Finally today, go check out Article VI guest blogger John Mark Reynolds. Very good stuff.Â
Â
Â
Â
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General, MSM Coverage, Mitt's Zingers | No Comments »
April 17th, 2007 by Jon
Â
Today there will be no News Roundup. For obvious reasons (at least to me) the prospect of culling through hundreds of links on numerous issues seems rather pointless given the events in Blacksburg yesterday.Â
This is a Virginia based blog, so the Virginia Tech tragedy hits a little too close to home. I’ve never been to Blacksburg, but I know several Hokies personally. As for this blog, it has been visited several times from the Virginia Tech campus. All I can do is offer my thoughts and prayers to those who have been given great cause to mourn this day.Â
In the coming days there will be much made of the massacre which took place in one of the least likely locations. There will be many who will attempt to dissect the psyche of the shooter to ascertain his motivation for taking so many lives in so brutal a fashion. Its not America’s most redeeming quality, but as we learned so well yesterday, people will do what people will do.Â
None of the pontifications – political or otherwise – will change the very grim and painful reality which now grips the campus of Virginia Tech and indeed the attention of the nation. Reality is there are 32 families who lost loved ones yesterday. 32 mothers, fathers, sisters, and brothers were taken suddenly and violently. Nothing that is said or written here or through any other medium can change that reality.Â
I often find solace and comfort in music, so I’ll share with you parts of two hymns which may bring peace to those souls who grieve this day:Â
Where can I turn for peace?
Where is my solace when other sources cease to make me whole?
When with a wounded heart, anger or malice I draw myself apart searching my soul?
Where when my aching grows, where when I languish, where in my need to know, where can I run?
Where is the quiet hand to calm my anguish?
Who, who can understand? He, only One.
He answers privately, reaches my reaching in my Gethsemane, Savior and Friend.
Gentle the peace he finds for my beseeching.
Constant he is and kind, Love with out end.
- Where Can I Turn For Peace by Emma Lou ThaneÂ
And finally, a few somewhat modified stanzas from some seldom sung verses of a seldom sung hymn:Â
There is no end to glory.
There is no end to love.
There is no end to union.
There is no death above.
- W.W. Phelps
A few weeks ago the world celebrated Easter. Easter is a celebration of life beyond this mortal sphere and at times like these I take comfort in knowing the tomb is empty.
Â
Â
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Campaign, General | No Comments »
April 12th, 2007 by Jon
Ann went to Birmingham to speak to the Alabama Federation of Republican Women.
The World Peace Herald’s Stephan Dinan declares that Mitt “supports Bush’s war on terror. Memo to Dinan: You have a short memory. This war was brought to the United States, not just to Bush. Better luck next column.
CBN’s David Brody again explores the abortion issue. Mitt states that he wants each state to decide the issue – which is exactly what would happen if Roe v. Wade was overturned. Those on the far right of the abortion debate aren’t satisfied with this, but then again, they won’t be satisfied with anything but an anti-abortion amendment which is never going to happen. Send Brody your comments.
Unity08’s Steve Kornacki, writing in the New York Observer attempts (and fails) to liken Mitt’s current campaign with Phil Graham’s ill fated 1995 oval office run. Kornacki is anything but original, citing old YouTube clips and “burn-rate†numbers which he simply doesn’t understand. Let’s get one thing straight – Kornacki wants a “bi-partisan†2008 ticket. He evidently missed the explanation of the two-party political system lecture most of us heard in Junior High. In this system, there are winners, there are losers. Nobody is interested in a compromise “kiss your sister†ticket.
And finally, Politico’s Kenneth Vogel reports on Eagle PAC – a Mormon run though not LDS Church sponsored Political Action Committee. He quotes BYU assistant political science professor J. Quin Monson on the political donations of most Mormons:
The average Mormon is stretched pretty thin. It’s not the first thing on their list to donate politically. It’s never really been something that’s been pushed by the church either. The church has made a big deal of pushing people to vote and to run for office but not to give political donations.
Hey, Quin! You’re poking holes in the commonly held illusion that we’re all exceptionally wealthy with money we don’t know what to do with. You’re ruining our image!!
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General, MSM Coverage | No Comments »
April 10th, 2007 by Jon
Blogfather Hugh has a fantastic take down of Kenneth Woodward. Woodward has been a contributing religion writer to Newsweek for nigh unto three decades. He claims to have the inside scoop on the “truth†about Mormons. Frankly stated, Woodward may have studied Mormons for a long time, but he has learned next to nothing. He’s able to write about less.
Hugh asked Woodward if he has any friends who also happen to be Mormon. Woodward was happy to divulge he has Mormon friends – mostly those found in journalistic and academic circles. He then referred to Sunstone magazine as a “Mormon†magazine. Here’s where Woodward’s problem lies. Sunstone is in no way officially associated with the LDS Church. At best it can be described as a pseudo-intellectual dissident publication which does its best to criticize LDS doctrines and policies. Memo to Kenneth Woodward – try LDS.org, the Ensign, or another official publication. You’re a bigot, plain and simple.  Hugh made short work of Woodward, and did it in fine fashion. Well done, Blogfather.
If you want a line by line dissection of Woodward’s article combined with Blogfather Hugh’s interview, please visit Lowell (who finally returned from Zion - see what happens when you take time off Lowell) at Article VI. I don’t think you’ll find a better running commentary anywhere in the Blogosphere.Â
The St. George Spectrum’s Mark Boggs wonders if Mitt is “Christian†enough for the GOP.
The Republican’s Dan Ring forecasts Mitt’s speech to Pioneer Valley Region of Massachusetts Citizens for Life at Chez Josef in Agawam.
The USAToday reports Mitt will push for more defense spending.
The Boston Globe’s Joan Vennochi (syndicated through the Salt Lake Trib – big surprise there) jumps on the Hunt-gate bandwagon. She tries, and spectacularly fails, to split fine hairs and paint Mitt as a flip-flopper. Hey, Joan, if this is the best you can do I’d suggest you take an eighteen month leave of absence. Mitt took some shots at small vermin. He’s not a big game hunter. Maybe he’s got better things to do with his time. That’s all the there in this story. Your exceptionally lame attempt to correlate Clinton’s “is†with Mitt’s “hunt†would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.
The Washington Post’s Dan Balz chronicles a March 5th exchange among campaign staffers for Mitt, Rudy, and McCain regarding the role which religion will play in the campaign. The fact remains that – as illustrated by Woodward’s bigoted cheap shot masquerading as journalism – it seems to be acceptable to attack Mormons and Mormonism on religious grounds where any similar attack on another group would be out of bounds.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General, MSM Coverage | No Comments »
March 22nd, 2007 by Jon
There just wasn’t much worth posting about yesterday.
Some in the MSM are surprised at the incentives Mitt is offering to those willing to work for his campaign. Via MyManMitt comes this information. If you bring in cash to Mitt’s coffers, he gives you a 10% commission. This will no doubt raise some liberal eyebrows. That’s to be expected. They don’t understand capitalism.
Forbes’ Evelyn Rusli quotes Mitt on the American Dream. Short and to the point.
Journal Chrétien’s Chad Groening finds a few former Democratic operatives who think Mitt’s religion is hurting his campaign. Gee, Chad, what exactly were you expecting them to say?
The Baltimore Sun’s Bruce Wilson hops on the bandwagon of those who want Mitt to hold the equivalent of a Friday night Fireside to “openly discuss†his religion – one Wilson, Mitt, and I happen to share. Memo to Bruce: This is a political race, not a theological one. JFK did little more than persuade people he wouldn’t be a pawn to Rome – he didn’t open himself up to a debate on the theological stance of the Catholic Church. In many ways Mitt has already followed the trail blazed by Kennedy. You may have already gotten all you’re going to get.
Howlin’ Mad Howie Dean’s Mitt Hit Man Damien LaVera has quoted himself yet again. He says “Smooth Talking†Mitt isn’t ready for Prime Time. Memo to Damien: Oh reaaallly? Is that why you’re wasting so much time, effort, energy and money taking shots at him? Methinks thou dost presume thyself far too smart. How many times a day do you Google yourself, Damien? Do you ever quote anyone but yourself?
Further proof that you can’t please everyone all the time.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General, MSM Coverage | No Comments »
March 15th, 2007 by Jon
The New York Times’ Pam Belluck writes about Mitt’s economic record. She cites the numbers for the first three paragraphs and then is quick to quote incoming Governor Patrick’s $1.3 billion budget hole. Memo to Pam: Patrick dug that hole himself. You might want to mention that.
LA Business Journal’s Howard Fine details the LA side of the Mitt campaign. (free subscription required)
The State Journal’s Juliet Terry interviews Mitt on some issues specific to West Virginia. He emphasizes clean coal technology as a way for the US to become energy independent. Just so you know, the US is the Saudi Arabia of coal. Find a way to replace oil with clean coal technology and the Mullahs will have to find something else to sell. Sand maybe.
The Hartford Courant’s Mark Silk fancies himself a religious scholar, but shows his utter ignorance about Mormons. Simply put, Mark, neither you nor “Evangelical Poohbah†Chuck Colson are qualified to stand as sentries at the gates of Christendom and decide who is and is not a Christian. This isn’t a race for Pastor. This is a race for President. Any religious debate is one you will quickly lose.
The Conservative Voice’s Dr. Douglas Schell has an interesting conversation on Mormon doctrine as it relates to the United States Constitution. He’s promised to keep the discussion and dialogue “respectfulâ€. It might be worth bookmarking.
WBZTV’s Jon Keller has some new polling data that might surprise some. I’m not holding my breath waiting for the MSM to trumpet the data.
On a personal note, I’d like to throw the Yellow Flag for Cheap Shotting on the Nation’s Nicholas Van Hoffman. He called out Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ Chief of Staff D. Kyle Sampson. Sampson evidently overstepped his authority by canning the eight US Attorneys without getting approval from the proper Gonzales.  Sampson himself was canned as a result. Not content with simply reporting the facts, Hoffman had to put in the obligatory cheap shot:
Hence it fell to Kyle Sampson to get rid of the federal prosecutors without bothering the boss. Kyle was the right person to do it. He’s a Mormon, a Brigham Young University graduate. You can depend on them. (emphasis added)Maybe I should put in a resume to Gonzales. I’m a Mormon, and a Brigham Young University graduate. Am I the right person?
I guess if you’re looking for a religious bigot with bad punctuation skills and a visceral desire to throw cowardly cheap shots at people who hold jobs he only dreams of, you need not look further than Nicholas Van Hoffman. He’s a hard left bigot. You can depend on him.
Memo to Nick: Cheap shots do not Pulitzers earn.  Get used to disappointment.
Â
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General, MSM Coverage | No Comments »
March 1st, 2007 by Jon
As you may or may not be aware, Blogfather Hugh has written a book on Mitt entitled “A Mormon In The White Houseâ€. I’ve been a long time fan of Blogfather Hugh. I spent the early morning hours of that fateful day in September of 2001 listening to his radio show and have more or less kept my Dimagiatti status ever since.
The book is slated for wide release in a few weeks and so Hugh is beginning to make the rounds of what will become a book tour. One of his first interviews was given (at the behest of his publisher) to the New York Times’ David Kirkpatrick. I don’t read the New York Times, much less David Kirkpatrick, but one of his questions set Hugh on fire and rubbed me the wrong way as well.
I think it can safely be said the MSM doesn’t like Mitt. They don’t understand anyone who doesn’t share their view. Kirkpatrick asked Hugh – evidently very bluntly – if Mitt had paid him to write the book. Yep, that must be the reason. Nobody would ever say anything positive about Mitt unless they were paid to do so. Kirkpatrick was operating under the rumor Mitt had spread some cash around the right side of the political media and evidently believed Hugh had received some of that cash.
Here’s my take: Hugh knew religion would be a factor in the 2008 campaign cycle because Mitt brings that issue to the forefront. He saw an opportunity to write a book about an unexplored subject and managed to convince a publisher it would be worth the investment. And yes, Hugh just might make a little cash if he flogs the book enough.
I don’t know where Kirkpatrick got the idea Hugh could be bought by the Mitt campaign. Hugh is an accomplished author, talk show host, and legal scholar. I’m sure he made out just fine before he wrote his most recent book, and – gods of capitalism willing- he’ll make out even better once the books hit the stands.
Memo to Mitt: If you’re spreading cash around the right side of the political spectrum, don’t forget to spread some this way. I make no illusions to the contrary, I can be bought.
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General | No Comments »
February 23rd, 2007 by Jon
Cross posted at MyManMitt
 With the inauguration of George W. Bush, there came to the Oval Office the first man to serve there who had been schooled in the ways and art of Business. Bush holds a Master’s Degree in Business Administration (MBA) from Harvard Business School. Mitt holds this same degree in addition to his Law degree – both from Harvard. I hold an MBA as well, albeit not from Harvard.
Part of any MBA curriculum are courses dedicated to teaching the principles of marketing. Every student has to take these classes, and although most people see such classes as “fluff†when compared to the hard sciences of accounting, finance and economics. The bottom line is you can finance, design, and build the best products known to man kind but if you don’t find innovative ways to induce people to buy them your business will eventually find its way into bankruptcy.
Some politicians are either good at marketing themselves or they have people who are good at doing it for them. As in the world of business, politics is a competitive environment. How a politician deals with his/her opponent is probably more important than what he or she actually says and does over the course of the campaign. One of the first things taught in advanced Marketing courses is the hard and fast rule that you don’t demean your competition. Highlighting differences and areas in which you or your product out performs the competition is important. Slamming the competition’s product or representatives has a tendency to leave a bad taste in the mouth of the customer.While this analogy can only be loosely fitted to the political world in which we now find ourselves, there are some quite recent examples of how some Presidential contenders deal with their opponents. Take first the Hillary-Obama Dust Up. Both of those Democratic contenders – more Hillary than Obama – took an issue which should’ve died a quick death and turned it into a media frenzy. In this case, not all publicity is good publicity.
Compare and contrast that with Mitt’s statements today in New Hampshire. When asked about his thoughts on the Hillary-Obama Cage Match, Mitt said:
It’s great, isn’t it? I love to see it when it happens on the other side.After referring to his primary opponents – Arizona Senator John McCain and former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani – as “friends†and “national heroesâ€
Mitt had this observation about the upcoming campaign:
I respect them. I’m sure we’ll disagree on issues from time to time, but I doubt you’ll see the rancor that apparently may exist elsewhere. (Emphasis Added)
This, dear reader, is the hallmark of someone who understands the importance of marketing perception. He doesn’t need to come out and directly attack his competition. All that will come out in the wash anyway. Mitt is marketing the positive aspects of what he has to offer the country as her next President.
That’s what will separate him from the pack.Â
Â
Â
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in General | 2 Comments »